Dating and Attraction

How people choose partners, from David Buss and Paul Eastwick on the science of attraction and compatibility to Matthew Hussey's dating advice and the signs you have found the right person.

5 summaries cover dating and attraction, from 2 podcasts. See them all

Get new relationships summaries by email

The Big Picture

Two researchers and one dating coach offer three ways of looking at how people choose each other. David Buss, on Huberman Lab, presents human mating as a rich evolved psychology shaped by reproductive asymmetries and mutual choice [2]. Paul Eastwick, also on Huberman Lab, reports findings that he sees as more hopeful than the online narratives about dating: what makes someone desirable matters most among strangers, and compatibility grows from shared moments and stories [1]. Matthew Hussey, speaking with Mel Robbins, is less concerned with why we are attracted than with what to do next, and insists that attraction and even love are not enough without compatibility [4].

All three accept that dating involves real difficulty. Hussey says that unlike fitness or saving money, you can do everything right and still not find love [5]. Buss's work explains why people lie while dating [3]. Eastwick notes that desire waxes and wanes even in good relationships [1].

Where the Experts Agree

  • Men and women want many of the same things. Buss says men and women share core desires such as kindness, intelligence, health, emotional stability and love [2]. Eastwick's research finds that men and women turn out to want largely the same things [1].
  • First impressions and profiles are a weak guide. Buss advises meeting in person rather than trusting profiles [2][3]. Eastwick says that with time, people's impressions of one another diverge, so early rankings lose their force [1]. Hussey calls dating apps dopamine machines and recommends going slow to go fast, rather than rushing into something precarious so you can announce it at Thanksgiving [5].
  • Watch what a person does over time. Buss recommends observing a partner under stress before committing, for example by traveling together, and watching how someone treats others and handles emotion [2][3]. Hussey warns that expecting a partner to recognize a problem, get motivated and sustain the effort to change is a huge assumption [4].
  • Attraction has a personal side. Buss says mate value has both a consensual part and a personal part; one professor he knows prizes men steeped in Russian literature [2]. Hussey tells of a friend who always dated dancers but married someone he calls the least coordinated person he has ever met, because his wife is an amazing partner, mother and best friend every day [4].
  • Fear of rejection can be worked through by acting. Buss cites psychologist Albert Ellis, who asked dozens of women out, got rejected often, and found his anxiety disappeared [2]. Hussey says to lead first, since if everyone only mirrors, nothing happens [5].

Where They Differ

How different the sexes are. This is the clearest gap. Buss holds that beyond their shared desires, men and women differ reliably in how they weigh resources, status, youth and appearance, in why they stray, and in what makes them jealous [2]. Eastwick puts the weight on similarity, concluding that men and women want largely the same things [1]. The passages do not show the two responding to each other directly, so readers should take this as a difference in emphasis between two research programs.

How much mate value matters. For Buss, mate value discrepancies can strain a relationship, and he advises being honest with yourself about what you bring [2][3]. Eastwick grants that mate value matters among strangers but argues its importance fades as people get to know one another [1].

Explaining or advising. Buss's central message is that romantic behavior, from stated preferences to jealousy, infidelity and even violence, follows an evolved logic, and he stresses that understanding that logic isn't the same as excusing it. He warns about dark triad traits and says a small group of dark-triad men does much of the harm [3]. Hussey works at the level of personal choice. He quotes Mitch Albom, "if you don't like the culture, you have to be brave enough to create your own," and observes that most people are culture adopters rather than leaders [5].

Who moves first. Hussey's long-standing advice is to invest based on how much someone invests in you, but he admits its flaw and now says to lead, then hold standards on the back end: if your initiative is not reciprocated, back off [5]. Buss mentions Robert Trivers's idea that self-deception makes deception more convincing, since people tend to take confidence at face value, which is a reason for caution about confident first moves from others [2].

What sustains a relationship. Eastwick confirms that feeling your partner is a good lover is one of the strongest predictors of how positively you feel about the relationship, and warns that long stretches without attraction can spiral because they make the other partner feel undesirable. He also warns against fatalism: passion can be rekindled [1]. Hussey defines compatibility as whether you can get your fundamental needs met, as opposed to the luxury items [4].

Practical Takeaways

  • Meet in person early instead of building a picture from a profile [2][3].
  • Give people time; impressions shift as you share moments and stories [1].
  • Travel together or otherwise see a partner under stress before committing [3].
  • Watch how someone treats other people and handles emotion, and stay alert to dark triad traits [2][3].
  • Take the first step, for example a voice note instead of another text, then back off if it isn't returned [5].
  • Separate fundamental needs from luxury items when judging compatibility [4].
  • Raise a problem with your partner, not only with your friends, before assuming they will change [4].
  • Don't read a dip in desire as the end; passion can be rekindled, though long droughts deserve attention [1].

Sources

  1. Dr. Paul Eastwick on the Real Science of Attraction, Compatibility and Romance · Huberman Lab
  2. Dr. David Buss: How Humans Select & Keep Romantic Partners in Short & Long Term · Huberman Lab
  3. Dr. David Buss on How Humans Choose, Keep and Lose Romantic Partners · Huberman Lab
  4. Matthew Hussey on the Four Levels of a Relationship: Admiration, Attraction, Commitment and Compatibility · The Mel Robbins Podcast
  5. Matthew Hussey and Mel Robbins on the Secret of a Happy Relationship · The Mel Robbins Podcast

See all 5 summaries about dating and attraction →

More on Dating and Attraction

The latest summaries about dating and attraction.

All 5