Get kids outside: myopia, mental health and character all point outdoors

September 27, 2026 · 16 min read

An eye researcher, a social psychologist and an outdoorsman arrive from different directions at the same advice: children need more time outdoors and less indoor screen time. Outdoor time appears to protect eyesight, supports healthier development than phone-based childhood, and builds self-reliance.

The insight in about three minutes.

Children need real hours outside, and three very different people reach that conclusion from three directions: eyesight, mental health and character. A Stanford eye surgeon, an NYU social psychologist and a Georgia bowhunter all point the same way: more time outdoors, less time on indoor screens, starting early.

Dr. Jeffrey Goldberg, chair of ophthalmology at Stanford, speaks to eyesight. For decades nearsightedness was blamed on close-up work such as reading. Newer studies point to light instead: children who spend more time outdoors in full-spectrum sunlight progress less in nearsightedness, and the first randomized trials support this. The difference between zero and one or two hours a day is clear, though the best dose is not yet known. Most myopia develops before age 10, so the window is childhood. He is not against screens. He tells parents to let children keep their screen or book time and move some of it outdoors.

Dr. Jonathan Haidt speaks to mental health. He says that between 2010 and 2015 childhood shifted from play-based to phone-based, and that for girls, measures of anxiety, depression and self-harm rose sharply from about 2012. In his words, a phone-based childhood is "just incompatible with healthy human development." Children had already been moved indoors by fear of abduction, which he calls a very rare risk. Outdoor free play teaches what phones cannot: making rules together, settling disputes and making mistakes at low stakes. His four norms are no smartphone before high school, no social media until 16, phone-free schools, and far more independence, free play and responsibility in the real world. Andrew Huberman adds that puberty is a sensitive period when fast rewards shape the brain quickly.

Michael Waddell, host of a hunting show, speaks from experience, not research. He grew up hunting with his uncles and now takes Navajo youth hunting each year. He laments kids glued to snack cakes and Xbox and describes time in the woods as humbling. For him "the trophy is relationships and the adventure."

They differ on screens and on what kind of outdoor time counts. Goldberg is relaxed about the screen itself; for eyes, what matters is where the time is spent. Haidt is far more concerned with the device. Goldberg's evidence is about sunlight, supervised or not. Haidt wants unsupervised, kid-run play. Waddell's outdoors is guided by adults. These describe different benefits and do not contradict each other. Haidt also acknowledges that a handful of researchers dispute that social media caused the mental health rise.

What to do with it: aim for at least one to two hours outdoors a day for young children, starting before age 10. Delay the smartphone and social media, and coordinate with other families so no child is alone. Grant real independence in small steps. Choose summer camps that do not allow phones. For a child with vision problems, a pediatric eye exam is the right first step. If a child shows signs of anxiety, depression or self-harm, get help from a pediatrician or mental health professional and do not rely on lifestyle changes alone.

This is the short form. The full insight has every expert's reasoning, their own words and the sources.