Procrastination and deadlines: when delay helps creativity and when it hurts

September 28, 2026 · 17 min read

Adam Grant describes a creative upside to procrastination, while Rick Rubin explains which phases of a project benefit from deadlines and which suffer. The contrast helps creators decide when to wait for ideas to incubate and when to force a finish.

The insight in about three minutes.

Delay helps creative work in one specific place: the stretch before you commit to an idea, when your mind still needs time to wander, collect and recombine. It hurts at the extremes and at the finish. The rule of thumb from these conversations is to start early, keep the idea loose while it incubates, and then set a private deadline once you can see the end.

Organizational psychologist Adam Grant brings the research. Procrastination, in his view, is not about avoiding work but about avoiding the negative emotions a task stirs up, such as boredom, fear, confusion or imposter feelings. With his doctoral student Jihae Shin he found that employees in a Korean company who procrastinated sometimes were rated more creative than those who rarely did, and a lab study that tempted people with YouTube videos showed the same pattern. In his words, "the peak of creativity is in the middle of procrastination". Both ends suffer from tunnel vision. People who dive in at once get stuck with their first ideas. People who wait until the last minute have to rush ahead with the easiest idea to implement. Those in the middle feel some pressure but still have time to work on ideas that were active in the back of their minds. One condition is crucial: the benefit appeared only when people were intrinsically interested in the task.

Music producer Rick Rubin reached a matching conclusion from decades in the studio. He describes four phases: seed collecting, experimentation, crafting and completion. For most of his career he gave every phase an open schedule. Writing his book taught him otherwise: "we're not required to treat the different phases of work in the same way". The early phases should have no deadline, but once you are deep into crafting and can see the end, a deadline will not hurt and may help. He admits some of his projects ran longer than they needed to because he did not know this.

Andrew Huberman, who hosted both conversations, loves deadlines because they clear away distraction, and sometimes delays to create one. Grant replies that this is not really procrastination, since Huberman delays for an expected benefit, not despite an expected cost.

They differ mostly in emphasis. Grant's research treats moderate delay as the mechanism, though in practice he now starts early and simply refuses to commit to an idea for a few weeks. Rubin never treats delay as useful in itself; he fills the gaps with other projects and trusts the subconscious to keep working. Huberman would prefer others to set his deadlines, while Rubin warns that a public deadline makes it harder to take extra time if the work turns out to have more potential. And the anxiety Grant sees driving avoidance is something Rubin feels at the start of every project without avoiding the work.

What to do with it: name the emotion behind your delay. Start early and commit late. Capture ideas all the time, with no deadline. Work in bursts of total focus, then walk away. Set a private deadline when you can see the end, and use the next project as the pull to finish this one. Delay on a task you don't care about has no creative upside. If avoidance driven by fear or anxiety is persistent or disabling, a mental health professional can help.

This is the short form. The full insight has every expert's reasoning, their own words and the sources.